START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY * Gettext: (gettext). GNU gettext utilities. * gettextize: (gettext)gettextize Invocation. Prepare a package for gettext. * msgfmt: (gettext)msgfmt Invocation. Make MO files out of PO files. * msgmerge: (gettext)msgmerge Invocation. Update two PO files into one. * xgettext: (gettext)xgettext Invocation. Extract strings into a PO file. END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY This file provides documentation for GNU `gettext' utilities. It also serves as a reference for the free Translation Project. Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that this permission notice may be stated in a translation approved by the Foundation. GNU `gettext' utilities *********************** Introduction ************ This manual is still in _DRAFT_ state. Some sections are still empty, or almost. We keep merging material from other sources (essentially e-mail folders) while the proper integration of this material is delayed. In this manual, we use _he_ when speaking of the programmer or maintainer, _she_ when speaking of the translator, and _they_ when speaking of the installers or end users of the translated program. This is only a convenience for clarifying the documentation. It is _absolutely_ not meant to imply that some roles are more appropriate to males or females. Besides, as you might guess, GNU `gettext' is meant to be useful for people using computers, whatever their sex, race, religion or nationality! This chapter explains the goals sought in the creation of GNU `gettext' and the free Translation Project. Then, it explains a few broad concepts around Native Language Support, and positions message translation with regard to other aspects of national and cultural variance, as they apply to to programs. It also surveys those files used to convey the translations. It explains how the various tools interact in the initial generation of these files, and later, how the maintenance cycle should usually operate. Please send suggestions and corrections to: Internet address: bug-gnu-gettext@gnu.org Please include the manual's edition number and update date in your messages. The Purpose of GNU `gettext' ============================ Usually, programs are written and documented in English, and use English at execution time to interact with users. This is true not only of GNU software, but also of a great deal of commercial and free software. Using a common language is quite handy for communication between developers, maintainers and users from all countries. On the other hand, most people are less comfortable with English than with their own native language, and would prefer to use their mother tongue for day to day's work, as far as possible. Many would simply _love_ to see their computer screen showing a lot less of English, and far more of their own language. However, to many people, this dream might appear so far fetched that they may believe it is not even worth spending time thinking about it. They have no confidence at all that the dream might ever become true. Yet some have not lost hope, and have organized themselves. The Translation Project is a formalization of this hope into a workable structure, which has a good chance to get all of us nearer the achievement of a truly multi-lingual set of programs. GNU `gettext' is an important step for the Translation Project, as it is an asset on which we may build many other steps. This package offers to programmers, translators and even users, a well integrated set of tools and documentation. Specifically, the GNU `gettext' utilities are a set of tools that provides a framework within which other free packages may produce multi-lingual messages. These tools include * A set of conventions about how programs should be written to support message catalogs. * A directory and file naming organization for the message catalogs themselves. * A runtime library supporting the retrieval of translated messages. * A few stand-alone programs to massage in various ways the sets of translatable strings, or already translated strings. * A special mode for Emacs(1) which helps preparing these sets and bringing them up to date. GNU `gettext' is designed to minimize the impact of internationalization on program sources, keeping this impact as small and hardly noticeable as possible. Internationalization has better chances of succeeding if it is very light weighted, or at least, appear to be so, when looking at program sources. The Translation Project also uses the GNU `gettext' distribution as a vehicle for documenting its structure and methods. This goes beyond the strict technicalities of documenting the GNU `gettext' proper. By so doing, translators will find in a single place, as far as possible, all they need to know for properly doing their translating work. Also, this supplemental documentation might also help programmers, and even curious users, in understanding how GNU `gettext' is related to the remainder of the Translation Project, and consequently, have a glimpse at the _big picture_. ---------- Footnotes ---------- (1) In this manual, all mentions of Emacs refers to either GNU Emacs or to XEmacs, which people sometimes call FSF Emacs and Lucid Emacs, respectively. I18n, L10n, and Such ==================== Two long words appear all the time when we discuss support of native language in programs, and these words have a precise meaning, worth being explained here, once and for all in this document. The words are _internationalization_ and _localization_. Many people, tired of writing these long words over and over again, took the habit of writing "i18n" and "l10n" instead, quoting the first and last letter of each word, and replacing the run of intermediate letters by a number merely telling how many such letters there are. But in this manual, in the sake of clarity, we will patiently write the names in full, each time... By "internationalization", one refers to the operation by which a program, or a set of programs turned into a package, is made aware of and able to support multiple languages. This is a generalization process, by which the programs are untied from calling only English strings or other English specific habits, and connected to generic ways of doing the same, instead. Program developers may use various techniques to internationalize their programs. Some of these have been standardized. GNU `gettext' offers one of these standards. *Note Programmers::. By "localization", one means the operation by which, in a set of programs already internationalized, one gives the program all needed information so that it can adapt itself to handle its input and output in a fashion which is correct for some native language and cultural habits. This is a particularisation process, by which generic methods already implemented in an internationalized program are used in specific ways. The programming environment puts several functions to the programmers disposal which allow this runtime configuration. The formal description of specific set of cultural habits for some country, together with all associated translations targeted to the same native language, is called the "locale" for this language or country. Users achieve localization of programs by setting proper values to special environment variables, prior to executing those programs, identifying which locale should be used. In fact, locale message support is only one component of the cultural data that makes up a particular locale. There are a whole host of routines and functions provided to aid programmers in developing internationalized software and which allow them to access the data stored in a particular locale. When someone presently refers to a particular locale, they are obviously referring to the data stored within that particular locale. Similarly, if a programmer is referring to "accessing the locale routines", they are referring to the complete suite of routines that access all of the locale's information. One uses the expression "Native Language Support", or merely NLS, for speaking of the overall activity or feature encompassing both internationalization and localization, allowing for multi-lingual interactions in a program. In a nutshell, one could say that internationalization is the operation by which further localizations are made possible. Also, very roughly said, when it comes to multi-lingual messages, internationalization is usually taken care of by programmers, and localization is usually taken care of by translators. Aspects in Native Language Support ================================== For a totally multi-lingual distribution, there are many things to translate beyond output messages. * As of today, GNU `gettext' offers a complete toolset for translating messages output by C programs. Perl scripts and shell scripts will also need to be translated. Even if there are today some hooks by which this can be done, these hooks are not integrated as well as they should be. * Some programs, like `autoconf' or `bison', are able to produce other programs (or scripts). Even if the generating programs themselves are internationalized, the generated programs they produce may need internationalization on their own, and this indirect internationalization could be automated right from the generating program. In fact, quite usually, generating and generated programs could be internationalized independently, as the effort needed is fairly orthogonal. * A few programs include textual tables which might need translation themselves, independently of the strings contained in the program itself. For example, RFC 1345 gives an English description for each character which the `recode' program is able to reconstruct at execution. Since these descriptions are extracted from the RFC by mechanical means, translating them properly would require a prior translation of the RFC itself. * Almost all programs accept options, which are often worded out so to be descriptive for the English readers; one might want to consider offering translated versions for program options as well. * Many programs read, interpret, compile, or are somewhat driven by input files which are texts containing keywords, identifiers, or replies which are inherently translatable. For example, one may want `gcc' to allow diacriticized characters in identifiers or use translated keywords; `rm -i' might accept something else than `y' or `n' for replies, etc. Even if the program will eventually make most of its output in the foreign languages, one has to decide whether the input syntax, option values, etc., are to be localized or not. * The manual accompanying a package, as well as all documentation files in the distribution, could surely be translated, too. Translating a manual, with the intent of later keeping up with updates, is a major undertaking in itself, generally. As we already stressed, translation is only one aspect of locales. Other internationalization aspects are system services and are handled in GNU `libc'. There are many attributes that are needed to define a country's cultural conventions. These attributes include beside the country's native language, the formatting of the date and time, the representation of numbers, the symbols for currency, etc. These local "rules" are termed the country's locale. The locale represents the knowledge needed to support the country's native attributes. There are a few major areas which may vary between countries and hence, define what a locale must describe. The following list helps putting multi-lingual messages into the proper context of other tasks related to locales. See the GNU `libc' manual for details. _Characters and Codesets_ The codeset most commonly used through out the USA and most English speaking parts of the world is the ASCII codeset. However, there are many characters needed by various locales that are not found within this codeset. The 8-bit ISO 8859-1 code set has most of the special characters needed to handle the major European languages. However, in many cases, the ISO 8859-1 font is not adequate: it doesn't even handle the major European currency. Hence each locale will need to specify which codeset they need to use and will need to have the appropriate character handling routines to cope with the codeset. _Currency_ The symbols used vary from country to country as does the position used by the symbol. Software needs to be able to transparently display currency figures in the native mode for each locale. _Dates_ The format of date varies between locales. For example, Christmas day in 1994 is written as 12/25/94 in the USA and as 25/12/94 in Australia. Other countries might use ISO 8061 dates, etc. Time of the day may be noted as HH:MM, HH.MM, or otherwise. Some locales require time to be specified in 24-hour mode rather than as AM or PM. Further, the nature and yearly extent of the Daylight Saving correction vary widely between countries. _Numbers_ Numbers can be represented differently in different locales. For example, the following numbers are all written correctly for their respective locales: 12,345.67 English 12.345,67 German 12345,67 French 1,2345.67 Asia Some programs could go further and use different unit systems, like English units or Metric units, or even take into account variants about how numbers are spelled in full. _Messages_ The most obvious area is the language support within a locale. This is where GNU `gettext' provides the means for developers and users to easily change the language that the software uses to communicate to the user. Components of locale outside of message handling are standardized in the ISO C standard and the SUSV2 specification. GNU `libc' fully implements this, and most other modern systems provide a more or less reasonable support for at least some of the missing components. Files Conveying Translations ============================ The letters PO in `.po' files means Portable Object, to distinguish it from `.mo' files, where MO stands for Machine Object. This paradigm, as well as the PO file format, is inspired by the NLS standard developed by Uniforum, and first implemented by Sun in their Solaris system. PO files are meant to be read and edited by humans, and associate each original, translatable string of a given package with its translation in a particular target language. A single PO file is dedicated to a single target language. If a package supports many languages, there is one such PO file per language supported, and each package has its own set of PO files. These PO files are best created by the `xgettext' program, and later updated or refreshed through the `msgmerge' program. Program `xgettext' extracts all marked messages from a set of C files and initializes a PO file with empty translations. Program `msgmerge' takes care of adjusting PO files between releases of the corresponding sources, commenting obsolete entries, initializing new ones, and updating all source line references. Files ending with `.pot' are kind of base translation files found in distributions, in PO file format. MO files are meant to be read by programs, and are binary in nature. A few systems already offer tools for creating and handling MO files as part of the Native Language Support coming with the system, but the format of these MO files is often different from system to system, and non-portable. The tools already provided with these systems don't support all the features of GNU `gettext'. Therefore GNU `gettext' uses its own format for MO files. Files ending with `.gmo' are really MO files, when it is known that these files use the GNU format. Overview of GNU `gettext' ========================= The following diagram summarizes the relation between the files handled by GNU `gettext' and the tools acting on these files. It is followed by somewhat detailed explanations, which you should read while keeping an eye on the diagram. Having a clear understanding of these interrelations will surely help programmers, translators and maintainers. Original C Sources ---> PO mode ---> Marked C Sources ---. | .---------<--- GNU gettext Library | .--- make <---+ | | `---------<--------------------+-----------' | | | .-----<--- PACKAGE.pot <--- xgettext <---' .---<--- PO Compendium | | | ^ | | `---. | | `---. +---> PO mode ---. | +----> msgmerge ------> LANG.po ---->--------' | | .---' | | | | | `-------------<---------------. | | +--- New LANG.po <------------------' | .--- LANG.gmo <--- msgfmt <---' | | | `---> install ---> /.../LANG/PACKAGE.mo ---. | +---> "Hello world!" `-------> install ---> /.../bin/PROGRAM -------' The indication `PO mode' appears in two places in this picture, and you may safely read it as merely meaning "hand editing", using any editor of your choice, really. However, for those of you being the lucky users of Emacs, PO mode has been specifically created for providing a cozy environment for editing or modifying PO files. While editing a PO file, PO mode allows for the easy browsing of auxiliary and compendium PO files, as well as for following references into the set of C program sources from which PO files have been derived. It has a few special features, among which are the interactive marking of program strings as translatable, and the validatation of PO files with easy repositioning to PO file lines showing errors. As a programmer, the first step to bringing GNU `gettext' into your package is identifying, right in the C sources, those strings which are meant to be translatable, and those which are untranslatable. This tedious job can be done a little more comfortably using emacs PO mode, but you can use any means familiar to you for modifying your C sources. Beside this some other simple, standard changes are needed to properly initialize the translation library. *Note Sources::, for more information about all this. For newly written software the strings of course can and should be marked while writing it. The `gettext' approach makes this very easy. Simply put the following lines at the beginning of each file or in a central header file: #define _(String) (String) #define N_(String) String #define textdomain(Domain) #define bindtextdomain(Package, Directory) Doing this allows you to prepare the sources for internationalization. Later when you feel ready for the step to use the `gettext' library simply replace these definitions by the following: #include #define _(String) gettext (String) #define gettext_noop(String) String #define N_(String) gettext_noop (String) and link against `libintl.a' or `libintl.so'. Note that on GNU systems, you don't need to link with `libintl' because the `gettext' library functions are already contained in GNU libc. That is all you have to change. Once the C sources have been modified, the `xgettext' program is used to find and extract all translatable strings, and create a PO template file out of all these. This `PACKAGE.pot' file contains all original program strings. It has sets of pointers to exactly where in C sources each string is used. All translations are set to empty. The letter `t' in `.pot' marks this as a Template PO file, not yet oriented towards any particular language. *Note xgettext Invocation::, for more details about how one calls the `xgettext' program. If you are _really_ lazy, you might be interested at working a lot more right away, and preparing the whole distribution setup (*note Maintainers::). By doing so, you spare yourself typing the `xgettext' command, as `make' should now generate the proper things automatically for you! The first time through, there is no `LANG.po' yet, so the `msgmerge' step may be skipped and replaced by a mere copy of `PACKAGE.pot' to `LANG.po', where LANG represents the target language. See *Note Creating:: for details. Then comes the initial translation of messages. Translation in itself is a whole matter, still exclusively meant for humans, and whose complexity far overwhelms the level of this manual. Nevertheless, a few hints are given in some other chapter of this manual (*note Translators::). You will also find there indications about how to contact translating teams, or becoming part of them, for sharing your translating concerns with others who target the same native language. While adding the translated messages into the `LANG.po' PO file, if you do not have Emacs handy, you are on your own for ensuring that your efforts fully respect the PO file format, and quoting conventions (*note PO Files::). This is surely not an impossible task, as this is the way many people have handled PO files already for Uniforum or Solaris. On the other hand, by using PO mode in Emacs, most details of PO file format are taken care of for you, but you have to acquire some familiarity with PO mode itself. Besides main PO mode commands (*note Main PO Commands::), you should know how to move between entries (*note Entry Positioning::), and how to handle untranslated entries (*note Untranslated Entries::). If some common translations have already been saved into a compendium PO file, translators may use PO mode for initializing untranslated entries from the compendium, and also save selected translations into the compendium, updating it (*note Compendium::). Compendium files are meant to be exchanged between members of a given translation team. Programs, or packages of programs, are dynamic in nature: users write bug reports and suggestion for improvements, maintainers react by modifying programs in various ways. The fact that a package has already been internationalized should not make maintainers shy of adding new strings, or modifying strings already translated. They just do their job the best they can. For the Translation Project to work smoothly, it is important that maintainers do not carry translation concerns on their already loaded shoulders, and that translators be kept as free as possible of programming concerns. The only concern maintainers should have is carefully marking new strings as translatable, when they should be, and do not otherwise worry about them being translated, as this will come in proper time. Consequently, when programs and their strings are adjusted in various ways by maintainers, and for matters usually unrelated to translation, `xgettext' would construct `PACKAGE.pot' files which are evolving over time, so the translations carried by `LANG.po' are slowly fading out of date. It is important for translators (and even maintainers) to understand that package translation is a continuous process in the lifetime of a package, and not something which is done once and for all at the start. After an initial burst of translation activity for a given package, interventions are needed once in a while, because here and there, translated entries become obsolete, and new untranslated entries appear, needing translation. The `msgmerge' program has the purpose of refreshing an already existing `LANG.po' file, by comparing it with a newer `PACKAGE.pot' template file, extracted by `xgettext' out of recent C sources. The refreshing operation adjusts all references to C source locations for strings, since these strings move as programs are modified. Also, `msgmerge' comments out as obsolete, in `LANG.po', those already translated entries which are no longer used in the program sources (*note Obsolete Entries::). It finally discovers new strings and inserts them in the resulting PO file as untranslated entries (*note Untranslated Entries::). *Note msgmerge Invocation::, for more information about what `msgmerge' really does. Whatever route or means taken, the goal is to obtain an updated `LANG.po' file offering translations for all strings. The temporal mobility, or fluidity of PO files, is an integral part of the translation game, and should be well understood, and accepted. People resisting it will have a hard time participating in the Translation Project, or will give a hard time to other participants! In particular, maintainers should relax and include all available official PO files in their distributions, even if these have not recently been updated, without exerting pressure on the translator teams to get the job done. The pressure should rather come from the community of users speaking a particular language, and maintainers should consider themselves fairly relieved of any concern about the adequacy of translation files. On the other hand, translators should reasonably try updating the PO files they are responsible for, while the package is undergoing pretest, prior to an official distribution. Once the PO file is complete and dependable, the `msgfmt' program is used for turning the PO file into a machine-oriented format, which may yield efficient retrieval of translations by the programs of the package, whenever needed at runtime (*note MO Files::). *Note msgfmt Invocation::, for more information about all modes of execution for the `msgfmt' program. Finally, the modified and marked C sources are compiled and linked with the GNU `gettext' library, usually through the operation of `make', given a suitable `Makefile' exists for the project, and the resulting executable is installed somewhere users will find it. The MO files themselves should also be properly installed. Given the appropriate environment variables are set (*note End Users::), the program should localize itself automatically, whenever it executes. The remainder of this manual has the purpose of explaining in depth the various steps outlined above. PO Files and PO Mode Basics *************************** The GNU `gettext' toolset helps programmers and translators at producing, updating and using translation files, mainly those PO files which are textual, editable files. This chapter stresses the format of PO files, and contains a PO mode starter. PO mode description is spread throughout this manual instead of being concentrated in one place. Here we present only the basics of PO mode. Completing GNU `gettext' Installation ===================================== Once you have received, unpacked, configured and compiled the GNU `gettext' distribution, the `make install' command puts in place the programs `xgettext', `msgfmt', `gettext', and `msgmerge', as well as their available message catalogs. To top off a comfortable installation, you might also want to make the PO mode available to your Emacs users. During the installation of the PO mode, you might want to modify your file `.emacs', once and for all, so it contains a few lines looking like: (setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.po\\'\\|\\.po\\." . po-mode) auto-mode-alist)) (autoload 'po-mode "po-mode" "Major mode for translators to edit PO files" t) Later, whenever you edit some `.po' file, or any file having the string `.po.' within its name, Emacs loads `po-mode.elc' (or `po-mode.el') as needed, and automatically activates PO mode commands for the associated buffer. The string _PO_ appears in the mode line for any buffer for which PO mode is active. Many PO files may be active at once in a single Emacs session. If you are using Emacs version 20 or newer, and have already installed the appropriate international fonts on your system, you may also tell Emacs how to determine automatically the coding system of every PO file. This will often (but not always) cause the necessary fonts to be loaded and used for displaying the translations on your Emacs screen. For this to happen, add the lines: (modify-coding-system-alist 'file "\\.po\\'\\|\\.po\\." 'po-find-file-coding-system) (autoload 'po-find-file-coding-system "po-mode") to your `.emacs' file. If, with this, you still see boxes instead of international characters, try a different font set (via Shift Mouse button 1). The Format of PO Files ====================== A PO file is made up of many entries, each entry holding the relation between an original untranslated string and its corresponding translation. All entries in a given PO file usually pertain to a single project, and all translations are expressed in a single target language. One PO file "entry" has the following schematic structure: WHITE-SPACE # TRANSLATOR-COMMENTS #. AUTOMATIC-COMMENTS #: REFERENCE... #, FLAG... msgid UNTRANSLATED-STRING msgstr TRANSLATED-STRING The general structure of a PO file should be well understood by the translator. When using PO mode, very little has to be known about the format details, as PO mode takes care of them for her. Entries begin with some optional white space. Usually, when generated through GNU `gettext' tools, there is exactly one blank line between entries. Then comments follow, on lines all starting with the character `#'. There are two kinds of comments: those which have some white space immediately following the `#', which comments are created and maintained exclusively by the translator, and those which have some non-white character just after the `#', which comments are created and maintained automatically by GNU `gettext' tools. All comments, of either kind, are optional. After white space and comments, entries show two strings, namely first the untranslated string as it appears in the original program sources, and then, the translation of this string. The original string is introduced by the keyword `msgid', and the translation, by `msgstr'. The two strings, untranslated and translated, are quoted in various ways in the PO file, using `"' delimiters and `\' escapes, but the translator does not really have to pay attention to the precise quoting format, as PO mode fully takes care of quoting for her. The `msgid' strings, as well as automatic comments, are produced and managed by other GNU `gettext' tools, and PO mode does not provide means for the translator to alter these. The most she can do is merely deleting them, and only by deleting the whole entry. On the other hand, the `msgstr' string, as well as translator comments, are really meant for the translator, and PO mode gives her the full control she needs. The comment lines beginning with `#,' are special because they are not completely ignored by the programs as comments generally are. The comma separated list of FLAGs is used by the `msgfmt' program to give the user some better diagnostic messages. Currently there are two forms of flags defined: `fuzzy' This flag can be generated by the `msgmerge' program or it can be inserted by the translator herself. It shows that the `msgstr' string might not be a correct translation (anymore). Only the translator can judge if the translation requires further modification, or is acceptable as is. Once satisfied with the translation, she then removes this `fuzzy' attribute. The `msgmerge' program inserts this when it combined the `msgid' and `msgstr' entries after fuzzy search only. *Note Fuzzy Entries::. `c-format' `no-c-format' These flags should not be added by a human. Instead only the `xgettext' program adds them. In an automated PO file processing system as proposed here the user changes would be thrown away again as soon as the `xgettext' program generates a new template file. In case the `c-format' flag is given for a string the `msgfmt' does some more tests to check to validity of the translation. *Note msgfmt Invocation::. A different kind of entries is used for translations which involve plural forms. WHITE-SPACE # TRANSLATOR-COMMENTS #. AUTOMATIC-COMMENTS #: REFERENCE... #, FLAG... msgid UNTRANSLATED-STRING-SINGULAR msgid_plural UNTRANSLATED-STRING-PLURAL msgstr[0] TRANSLATED-STRING-CASE-0 ... msgstr[N] TRANSLATED-STRING-CASE-N It happens that some lines, usually whitespace or comments, follow the very last entry of a PO file. Such lines are not part of any entry, and PO mode is unable to take action on those lines. By using the PO mode function `M-x po-normalize', the translator may get rid of those spurious lines. *Note Normalizing::. The remainder of this section may be safely skipped by those using PO mode, yet it may be interesting for everybody to have a better idea of the precise format of a PO file. On the other hand, those not having Emacs handy should carefully continue reading on. Each of UNTRANSLATED-STRING and TRANSLATED-STRING respects the C syntax for a character string, including the surrounding quotes and embedded backslashed escape sequences. When the time comes to write multi-line strings, one should not use escaped newlines. Instead, a closing quote should follow the last character on the line to be continued, and an opening quote should resume the string at the beginning of the following PO file line. For example: msgid "" "Here is an example of how one might continue a very long string\n" "for the common case the string represents multi-line output.\n" In this example, the empty string is used on the first line, to allow better alignment of the `H' from the word `Here' over the `f' from the word `for'. In this example, the `msgid' keyword is followed by three strings, which are meant to be concatenated. Concatenating the empty string does not change the resulting overall string, but it is a way for us to comply with the necessity of `msgid' to be followed by a string on the same line, while keeping the multi-line presentation left-justified, as we find this to be a cleaner disposition. The empty string could have been omitted, but only if the string starting with `Here' was promoted on the first line, right after `msgid'.(1) It was not really necessary either to switch between the two last quoted strings immediately after the newline `\n', the switch could have occurred after _any_ other character, we just did it this way because it is neater. One should carefully distinguish between end of lines marked as `\n' _inside_ quotes, which are part of the represented string, and end of lines in the PO file itself, outside string quotes, which have no incidence on the represented string. Outside strings, white lines and comments may be used freely. Comments start at the beginning of a line with `#' and extend until the end of the PO file line. Comments written by translators should have the initial `#' immediately followed by some white space. If the `#' is not immediately followed by white space, this comment is most likely generated and managed by specialized GNU tools, and might disappear or be replaced unexpectedly when the PO file is given to `msgmerge'. ---------- Footnotes ---------- (1) This limitation is not imposed by GNU `gettext', but is for compatibility with the `msgfmt' implementation on Solaris. Main PO mode Commands ===================== After setting up Emacs with something similar to the lines in *Note Installation::, PO mode is activated for a window when Emacs finds a PO file in that window. This puts the window read-only and establishes a po-mode-map, which is a genuine Emacs mode, in a way that is not derived from text mode in any way. Functions found on `po-mode-hook', if any, will be executed. When PO mode is active in a window, the letters `PO' appear in the mode line for that window. The mode line also displays how many entries of each kind are held in the PO file. For example, the string `132t+3f+10u+2o' would tell the translator that the PO mode contains 132 translated entries (*note Translated Entries::, 3 fuzzy entries (*note Fuzzy Entries::), 10 untranslated entries (*note Untranslated Entries::) and 2 obsolete entries (*note Obsolete Entries::). Zero-coefficients items are not shown. So, in this example, if the fuzzy entries were unfuzzied, the untranslated entries were translated and the obsolete entries were deleted, the mode line would merely display `145t' for the counters. The main PO commands are those which do not fit into the other categories of subsequent sections. These allow for quitting PO mode or for managing windows in special ways. `_' Undo last modification to the PO file (`po-undo'). `Q' Quit processing and save the PO file (`po-quit'). `q' Quit processing, possibly after confirmation (`po-confirm-and-quit'). `0' Temporary leave the PO file window (`po-other-window'). `?' `h' Show help about PO mode (`po-help'). `=' Give some PO file statistics (`po-statistics'). `V' Batch validate the format of the whole PO file (`po-validate'). The command `_' (`po-undo') interfaces to the Emacs _undo_ facility. *Note Undoing Changes: (emacs)Undo. Each time `U' is typed, modifications which the translator did to the PO file are undone a little more. For the purpose of undoing, each PO mode command is atomic. This is especially true for the `' command: the whole edition made by using a single use of this command is undone at once, even if the edition itself implied several actions. However, while in the editing window, one can undo the edition work quite parsimoniously. The commands `Q' (`po-quit') and `q' (`po-confirm-and-quit') are used when the translator is done with the PO file. The former is a bit less verbose than the latter. If the file has been modified, it is saved to disk first. In both cases, and prior to all this, the commands check if any untranslated messages remain in the PO file and, if so, the translator is asked if she really wants to leave off working with this PO file. This is the preferred way of getting rid of an Emacs PO file buffer. Merely killing it through the usual command `C-x k' (`kill-buffer') is not the tidiest way to proceed. The command `0' (`po-other-window') is another, softer way, to leave PO mode, temporarily. It just moves the cursor to some other Emacs window, and pops one if necessary. For example, if the translator just got PO mode to show some source context in some other, she might discover some apparent bug in the program source that needs correction. This command allows the translator to change sex, become a programmer, and have the cursor right into the window containing the program she (or rather _he_) wants to modify. By later getting the cursor back in the PO file window, or by asking Emacs to edit this file once again, PO mode is then recovered. The command `h' (`po-help') displays a summary of all available PO mode commands. The translator should then type any character to resume normal PO mode operations. The command `?' has the same effect as `h'. The command `=' (`po-statistics') computes the total number of entries in the PO file, the ordinal of the current entry (counted from 1), the number of untranslated entries, the number of obsolete entries, and displays all these numbers. The command `V' (`po-validate') launches `msgfmt' in checking and verbose mode over the current PO file. This command first offers to save the current PO file on disk. The `msgfmt' tool, from GNU `gettext', has the purpose of creating a MO file out of a PO file, and PO mode uses the features of this program for checking the overall format of a PO file, as well as all individual entries. The program `msgfmt' runs asynchronously with Emacs, so the translator regains control immediately while her PO file is being studied. Error output is collected in the Emacs `*compilation*' buffer, displayed in another window. The regular Emacs command `C-x`' (`next-error'), as well as other usual compile commands, allow the translator to reposition quickly to the offending parts of the PO file. Once the cursor is on the line in error, the translator may decide on any PO mode action which would help correcting the error. Entry Positioning ================= The cursor in a PO file window is almost always part of an entry. The only exceptions are the special case when the cursor is after the last entry in the file, or when the PO file is empty. The entry where the cursor is found to be is said to be the current entry. Many PO mode commands operate on the current entry, so moving the cursor does more than allowing the translator to browse the PO file, this also selects on which entry commands operate. Some PO mode commands alter the position of the cursor in a specialized way. A few of those special purpose positioning are described here, the others are described in following sections (for a complete list try `C-h m'): `.' Redisplay the current entry (`po-current-entry'). `n' Select the entry after the current one (`po-next-entry'). `p' Select the entry before the current one (`po-previous-entry'). `<' Select the first entry in the PO file (`po-first-entry'). `>' Select the last entry in the PO file (`po-last-entry'). `m' Record the location of the current entry for later use (`po-push-location'). `r' Return to a previously saved entry location (`po-pop-location'). `x' Exchange the current entry location with the previously saved one (`po-exchange-location'). Any Emacs command able to reposition the cursor may be used to select the current entry in PO mode, including commands which move by characters, lines, paragraphs, screens or pages, and search commands. However, there is a kind of standard way to display the current entry in PO mode, which usual Emacs commands moving the cursor do not especially try to enforce. The command `.' (`po-current-entry') has the sole purpose of redisplaying the current entry properly, after the current entry has been changed by means external to PO mode, or the Emacs screen otherwise altered. It is yet to be decided if PO mode helps the translator, or otherwise irritates her, by forcing a rigid window disposition while she is doing her work. We originally had quite precise ideas about how windows should behave, but on the other hand, anyone used to Emacs is often happy to keep full control. Maybe a fixed window disposition might be offered as a PO mode option that the translator might activate or deactivate at will, so it could be offered on an experimental basis. If nobody feels a real need for using it, or a compulsion for writing it, we should drop this whole idea. The incentive for doing it should come from translators rather than programmers, as opinions from an experienced translator are surely more worth to me than opinions from programmers _thinking_ about how _others_ should do translation. The commands `n' (`po-next-entry') and `p' (`po-previous-entry') move the cursor the entry following, or preceding, the current one. If `n' is given while the cursor is on the last entry of the PO file, or if `p' is given while the cursor is on the first entry, no move is done. The commands `<' (`po-first-entry') and `>' (`po-last-entry') move the cursor to the first entry, or last entry, of the PO file. When the cursor is located past the last entry in a PO file, most PO mode commands will return an error saying `After last entry'. Moreover, the commands `<' and `>' have the special property of being able to work even when the cursor is not into some PO file entry, and one may use them for nicely correcting this situation. But even these commands will fail on a truly empty PO file. There are development plans for the PO mode for it to interactively fill an empty PO file from sources. *Note Marking::. The translator may decide, before working at the translation of a particular entry, that she needs to browse the remainder of the PO file, maybe for finding the terminology or phraseology used in related entries. She can of course use the standard Emacs idioms for saving the current cursor location in some register, and use that register for getting back, or else, use the location ring. PO mode offers another approach, by which cursor locations may be saved onto a special stack. The command `m' (`po-push-location') merely adds the location of current entry to the stack, pushing the already saved locations under the new one. The command `r' (`po-pop-location') consumes the top stack element and repositions the cursor to the entry associated with that top element. This position is then lost, for the next `r' will move the cursor to the previously saved location, and so on until no locations remain on the stack. If the translator wants the position to be kept on the location stack, maybe for taking a look at the entry associated with the top element, then go elsewhere with the intent of getting back later, she ought to use `m' immediately after `r'. The command `x' (`po-exchange-location') simultaneously repositions the cursor to the entry associated with the top element of the stack of saved locations, and replaces that top element with the location of the current entry before the move. Consequently, repeating the `x' command toggles alternatively between two entries. For achieving this, the translator will position the cursor on the first entry, use `m', then position to the second entry, and merely use `x' for making the switch. Normalizing Strings in Entries ============================== There are many different ways for encoding a particular string into a PO file entry, because there are so many different ways to split and quote multi-line strings, and even, to represent special characters by backslashed escaped sequences. Some features of PO mode rely on the ability for PO mode to scan an already existing PO file for a particular string encoded into the `msgid' field of some entry. Even if PO mode has internally all the built-in machinery for implementing this recognition easily, doing it fast is technically difficult. To facilitate a solution to this efficiency problem, we decided on a canonical representation for strings. A conventional representation of strings in a PO file is currently under discussion, and PO mode experiments with a canonical representation. Having both `xgettext' and PO mode converging towards a uniform way of representing equivalent strings would be useful, as the internal normalization needed by PO mode could be automatically satisfied when using `xgettext' from GNU `gettext'. An explicit PO mode normalization should then be only necessary for PO files imported from elsewhere, or for when the convention itself evolves. So, for achieving normalization of at least the strings of a given PO file needing a canonical representation, the following PO mode command is available: `M-x po-normalize' Tidy the whole PO file by making entries more uniform. The special command `M-x po-normalize', which has no associated keys, revises all entries, ensuring that strings of both original and translated entries use uniform internal quoting in the PO file. It also removes any crumb after the last entry. This command may be useful for PO files freshly imported from elsewhere, or if we ever improve on the canonical quoting format we use. This canonical format is not only meant for getting cleaner PO files, but also for greatly speeding up `msgid' string lookup for some other PO mode commands. `M-x po-normalize' presently makes three passes over the entries. The first implements heuristics for converting PO files for GNU `gettext' 0.6 and earlier, in which `msgid' and `msgstr' fields were using K&R style C string syntax for multi-line strings. These heuristics may fail for comments not related to obsolete entries and ending with a backslash; they also depend on subsequent passes for finalizing the proper commenting of continued lines for obsolete entries. This first pass might disappear once all oldish PO files would have been adjusted. The second and third pass normalize all `msgid' and `msgstr' strings respectively. They also clean out those trailing backslashes used by XView's `msgfmt' for continued lines. Having such an explicit normalizing command allows for importing PO files from other sources, but also eases the evolution of the current convention, evolution driven mostly by aesthetic concerns, as of now. It is easy to make suggested adjustments at a later time, as the normalizing command and eventually, other GNU `gettext' tools should greatly automate conformance. A description of the canonical string format is given below, for the particular benefit of those not having Emacs handy, and who would nevertheless want to handcraft their PO files in nice ways. Right now, in PO mode, strings are single line or multi-line. A string goes multi-line if and only if it has _embedded_ newlines, that is, if it matches `[^\n]\n+[^\n]'. So, we would have: msgstr "\n\nHello, world!\n\n\n" but, replacing the space by a newline, this becomes: msgstr "" "\n" "\n" "Hello,\n" "world!\n" "\n" "\n" We are deliberately using a caricatural example, here, to make the point clearer. Usually, multi-lines are not that bad looking. It is probable that we will implement the following suggestion. We might lump together all initial newlines into the empty string, and also all newlines introducing empty lines (that is, for N > 1, the N-1'th last newlines would go together on a separate string), so making the previous example appear: msgstr "\n\n" "Hello,\n" "world!\n" "\n\n" There are a few yet undecided little points about string normalization, to be documented in this manual, once these questions settle. Preparing Program Sources ************************* For the programmer, changes to the C source code fall into three categories. First, you have to make the localization functions known to all modules needing message translation. Second, you should properly trigger the operation of GNU `gettext' when the program initializes, usually from the `main' function. Last, you should identify and especially mark all constant strings in your program needing translation. Presuming that your set of programs, or package, has been adjusted so all needed GNU `gettext' files are available, and your `Makefile' files are adjusted (*note Maintainers::), each C module having translated C strings should contain the line: #include The remaining changes to your C sources are discussed in the further sections of this chapter. Triggering `gettext' Operations =============================== The initialization of locale data should be done with more or less the same code in every program, as demonstrated below: int main (argc, argv) int argc; char argv; { ... setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); bindtextdomain (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR); textdomain (PACKAGE); ... } PACKAGE and LOCALEDIR should be provided either by `config.h' or by the Makefile. For now consult the `gettext' or `hello' sources for more information. The use of `LC_ALL' might not be appropriate for you. `LC_ALL' includes all locale categories and especially `LC_CTYPE'. This later category is responsible for determining character classes with the `isalnum' etc. functions from `ctype.h' which could especially for programs, which process some kind of input language, be wrong. For example this would mean that a source code using the c, (c-cedilla character) is runnable in France but not in the U.S. Some systems also have problems with parsing numbers using the `scanf' functions if an other but the `LC_ALL' locale is used. The standards say that additional formats but the one known in the `"C"' locale might be recognized. But some systems seem to reject numbers in the `"C"' locale format. In some situation, it might also be a problem with the notation itself which makes it impossible to recognize whether the number is in the `"C"' locale or the local format. This can happen if thousands separator characters are used. Some locales define this character accordfing to the national conventions to `'.'' which is the same character used in the `"C"' locale to denote the decimal point. So it is sometimes necessary to replace the `LC_ALL' line in the code above by a sequence of `setlocale' lines { ... setlocale (LC_CTYPE, ""); setlocale (LC_MESSAGES, ""); ... } On all POSIX conformant systems the locale categories `LC_CTYPE', `LC_COLLATE', `LC_MONETARY', `LC_NUMERIC', and `LC_TIME' are available. On some modern systems there is also a locale `LC_MESSAGES' which is called on some old, XPG2 compliant systems `LC_RESPONSES'. Note that changing the `LC_CTYPE' also affects the functions declared in the `' standard header. If this is not desirable in your application (for example in a compiler's parser), you can use a set of substitute functions which hardwire the C locale, such as found in the `' and `' files in the gettext source distribution. It is also possible to switch the locale forth and back between the environment dependent locale and the C locale, but this approach is normally avoided because a `setlocale' call is expensive, because it is tedious to determine the places where a locale switch is needed in a large program's source, and because switching a locale is not multithread-safe. Preparing Translatable Strings ============================== Before strings can be marked for translations, they sometimes need to be adjusted. Usually preparing a string for translation is done right before marking it, during the marking phase which is described in the next sections. What you have to keep in mind while doing that is the following. * Decent English style. * Entire sentences. * Split at paragraphs. * Use format strings instead of string concatenation. Let's look at some examples of these guidelines. Translatable strings should be in good English style. If slang language with abbreviations and shortcuts is used, often translators will not understand the message and will produce very inappropriate translations. "%s: is parameter\n" This is nearly untranslatable: Is the displayed item _a_ parameter or _the_ parameter? "No match" The ambiguity in this message makes it ununderstandable: Is the program attempting to set something on fire? Does it mean "The given object does not match the template"? Does it mean "The template does not fit for any of the objects"? In both cases, adding more words to the message will help both the translator and the English speaking user. Translatable strings should be entire sentences. It is often not possible to translate single verbs or adjectives in a substitutable way. printf ("File %s is %s protected", filename, rw ? "write" : "read"); Most translators will not look at the source and will thus only see the string `"File %s is %s protected"', which is unintelligible. Change this to printf (rw ? "File %s is write protected" : "File %s is read protected", filename); This way the translator will not only understand the message, she will also be able to find the appropriate grammatical construction. The French translator for example translates "write protected" like "protected against writing". Often sentences don't fit into a single line. If a sentence is output using two subsequent `printf' statements, like this printf ("Locale charset \"%s\" is different from\n", lcharset); printf ("input file charset \"%s\".\n", fcharset); the translator would have to translate two half sentences, but nothing in the POT file would tell her that the two half sentences belong together. It is necessary to merge the two `printf' statements so that the translator can handle the entire sentence at once and decide at which place to insert a line break in the translation (if at all): printf ("Locale charset \"%s\" is different from\n\ input file charset \"%s\".\n", lcharset, fcharset); You may now ask: how about two or more adjacent sentences? Like in this case: puts ("Apollo 13 scenario: Stack overflow handling failed."); puts ("On the next stack overflow we will crash!!!"); Should these two statements merged into a single one? I would recommend to merge them if the two sentences are related to each other, because then it makes it easier for the translator to understand and translate both. On the other hand, if one of the two messages is a stereotypic one, occurring in other places as well, you will do a favour to the translator by not merging the two. (Identical messages occurring in several places are combined by xgettext, so the translator has to handle them once only.) Translatable strings should be limited to one paragraph; don't let a single message be longer than ten lines. The reason is that when the translatable string changes, the translator is faced with the task of updating the entire translated string. Maybe only a single word will have changed in the English string, but the translator doesn't see that (with the current translation tools), therefore she has to proofread the entire message. Many GNU programs have a `--help' output that extends over several screen pages. It is a courtesy towards the translators to split such a message into several ones of five to ten lines each. While doing that, you can also attempt to split the documented options into groups, such as the input options, the output options, and the informative output options. This will help every user to find the option he is looking for. Hardcoded string concatenation is sometimes used to construct English strings: strcpy (s, "Replace "); strcat (s, object1); strcat (s, " with "); strcat (s, object2); strcat (s, "?"); In order to present to the translator only entire sentences, and also because in some languages the translator might want to swap the order of `object1' and `object2', it is necessary to change this to use a format string: sprintf (s, "Replace %s with %s?", object1, object2); A similar case is compile time concatenation of strings. The ISO C 99 include file `' contains a macro `PRId64' that can be used as a formatting directive for outputting an `int64_t' integer through `printf'. It expands to a constant string, usually "d" or "ld" or "lld" or something like this, depending on the platform. Assume you have code like printf ("The amount is %0" PRId64 "\n"), number); After marking, this cannot become printf (gettext ("The amount is %0") PRId64 "\n"), number); because it would simply be invalid C syntax. It cannot become printf (gettext ("The amount is %0" PRId64 "\n")), number); because the value of `PRId64' is not known to `xgettext', and even if were, there would be three or more possibilities, and the translator would have to translate three or more strings that differ in a single letter. The solution for this problem is to change the code like this: char buf1[100]; sprintf (buf1, "%0" PRId64, number); printf (gettext ("The amount is %s\n"), buf1); This means, you put the platform dependent code in one statement, and the internationalization code in a different statement. Note that a buffer length of 100 is safe, because all available hardware integer types are limited to 128 bits, and to print a 128 bit integer one needs at most 54 characters, regardless whether in decimal, octal or hexadecimal. All this applies to other programming languages as well. For example, in Java, string contenation is very frequently used, because it is a compiler built-in operator. Like in C, in Java, you would change System.out.println("Replace "+object1+" with "+object2+"?"); into a statement involving a format string: System.out.println( MessageFormat.format("Replace {0} with {1}?", new Object[] { object1, object2 })); How Marks Appear in Sources =========================== All strings requiring translation should be marked in the C sources. Marking is done in such a way that each translatable string appears to be the sole argument of some function or preprocessor macro. There are only a few such possible functions or macros meant for translation, and their names are said to be marking keywords. The marking is attached to strings themselves, rather than to what we do with them. This approach has more uses. A blatant example is an error message produced by formatting. The format string needs translation, as well as some strings inserted through some `%s' specification in the format, while the result from `sprintf' may have so many different instances that it is impractical to list them all in some `error_string_out()' routine, say. This marking operation has two goals. The first goal of marking is for triggering the retrieval of the translation, at run time. The keyword are possibly resolved into a routine able to dynamically return the proper translation, as far as possible or wanted, for the argument string. Most localizable strings are found in executable positions, that is, attached to variables or given as parameters to functions. But this is not universal usage, and some translatable strings appear in structured initializations. *Note Special cases::. The second goal of the marking operation is to help `xgettext' at properly extracting all translatable strings when it scans a set of program sources and produces PO file templates. The canonical keyword for marking translatable strings is `gettext', it gave its name to the whole GNU `gettext' package. For packages making only light use of the `gettext' keyword, macro or function, it is easily used _as is_. However, for packages using the `gettext' interface more heavily, it is usually more convenient to give the main keyword a shorter, less obtrusive name. Indeed, the keyword might appear on a lot of strings all over the package, and programmers usually do not want nor need their program sources to remind them forcefully, all the time, that they are internationalized. Further, a long keyword has the disadvantage of using more horizontal space, forcing more indentation work on sources for those trying to keep them within 79 or 80 columns. Many packages use `_' (a simple underline) as a keyword, and write `_("Translatable string")' instead of `gettext ("Translatable string")'. Further, the coding rule, from GNU standards, wanting that there is a space between the keyword and the opening parenthesis is relaxed, in practice, for this particular usage. So, the textual overhead per translatable string is reduced to only three characters: the underline and the two parentheses. However, even if GNU `gettext' uses this convention internally, it does not offer it officially. The real, genuine keyword is truly `gettext' indeed. It is fairly easy for those wanting to use `_' instead of `gettext' to declare: #include #define _(String) gettext (String) instead of merely using `#include '. Later on, the maintenance is relatively easy. If, as a programmer, you add or modify a string, you will have to ask yourself if the new or altered string requires translation, and include it within `_()' if you think it should be translated. `"%s: %d"' is an example of string _not_ requiring translation! Marking Translatable Strings ============================ In PO mode, one set of features is meant more for the programmer than for the translator, and allows him to interactively mark which strings, in a set of program sources, are translatable, and which are not. Even if it is a fairly easy job for a programmer to find and mark such strings by other means, using any editor of his choice, PO mode makes this work more comfortable. Further, this gives translators who feel a little like programmers, or programmers who feel a little like translators, a tool letting them work at marking translatable strings in the program sources, while simultaneously producing a set of translation in some language, for the package being internationalized. The set of program sources, targetted by the PO mode commands describe here, should have an Emacs tags table constructed for your project, prior to using these PO file commands. This is easy to do. In any shell window, change the directory to the root of your project, then execute a command resembling: etags src/*.[hc] lib/*.[hc] presuming here you want to process all `.h' and `.c' files from the `src/' and `lib/' directories. This command will explore all said files and create a `TAGS' file in your root directory, somewhat summarizing the contents using a special file format Emacs can understand. For packages following the GNU coding standards, there is a make goal `tags' or `TAGS' which constructs the tag files in all directories and for all files containing source code. Once your `TAGS' file is ready, the following commands assist the programmer at marking translatable strings in his set of sources. But these commands are necessarily driven from within a PO file window, and it is likely that you do not even have such a PO file yet. This is not a problem at all, as you may safely open a new, empty PO file, mainly for using these commands. This empty PO file will slowly fill in while you mark strings as translatable in your program sources. `,' Search through program sources for a string which looks like a candidate for translation (`po-tags-search'). `M-,' Mark the last string found with `_()' (`po-mark-translatable'). `M-.' Mark the last string found with a keyword taken from a set of possible keywords. This command with a prefix allows some management of these keywords (`po-select-mark-and-mark'). The `,' (`po-tags-search') command searches for the next occurrence of a string which looks like a possible candidate for translation, and displays the program source in another Emacs window, positioned in such a way that the string is near the top of this other window. If the string is too big to fit whole in this window, it is positioned so only its end is shown. In any case, the cursor is left in the PO file window. If the shown string would be better presented differently in different native languages, you may mark it using `M-,' or `M-.'. Otherwise, you might rather ignore it and skip to the next string by merely repeating the `,' command. A string is a good candidate for translation if it contains a sequence of three or more letters. A string containing at most two letters in a row will be considered as a candidate if it has more letters than non-letters. The command disregards strings containing no letters, or isolated letters only. It also disregards strings within comments, or strings already marked with some keyword PO mode knows (see below). If you have never told Emacs about some `TAGS' file to use, the command will request that you specify one from the minibuffer, the first time you use the command. You may later change your `TAGS' file by using the regular Emacs command `M-x visit-tags-table', which will ask you to name the precise `TAGS' file you want to use. *Note Tag Tables: (emacs)Tags. Each time you use the `,' command, the search resumes from where it was left by the previous search, and goes through all program sources, obeying the `TAGS' file, until all sources have been processed. However, by giving a prefix argument to the command (`C-u ,'), you may request that the search be restarted all over again from the first program source; but in this case, strings that you recently marked as translatable will be automatically skipped. Using this `,' command does not prevent using of other regular Emacs tags commands. For example, regular `tags-search' or `tags-query-replace' commands may be used without disrupting the independent `,' search sequence. However, as implemented, the _initial_ `,' command (or the `,' command is used with a prefix) might also reinitialize the regular Emacs tags searching to the first tags file, this reinitialization might be considered spurious. The `M-,' (`po-mark-translatable') command will mark the recently found string with the `_' keyword. The `M-.' (`po-select-mark-and-mark') command will request that you type one keyword from the minibuffer and use that keyword for marking the string. Both commands will automatically create a new PO file untranslated entry for the string being marked, and make it the current entry (making it easy for you to immediately proceed to its translation, if you feel like doing it right away). It is possible that the modifications made to the program source by `M-,' or `M-.' render some source line longer than 80 columns, forcing you to break and re-indent this line differently. You may use the `O' command from PO mode, or any other window changing command from Emacs, to break out into the program source window, and do any needed adjustments. You will have to use some regular Emacs command to return the cursor to the PO file window, if you want command `,' for the next string, say. The `M-.' command has a few built-in speedups, so you do not have to explicitly type all keywords all the time. The first such speedup is that you are presented with a _preferred_ keyword, which you may accept by merely typing `' at the prompt. The second speedup is that you may type any non-ambiguous prefix of the keyword you really mean, and the command will complete it automatically for you. This also means that PO mode has to _know_ all your possible keywords, and that it will not accept mistyped keywords. If you reply `?' to the keyword request, the command gives a list of all known keywords, from which you may choose. When the command is prefixed by an argument (`C-u M-.'), it inhibits updating any program source or PO file buffer, and does some simple keyword management instead. In this case, the command asks for a keyword, written in full, which becomes a new allowed keyword for later `M-.' commands. Moreover, this new keyword automatically becomes the _preferred_ keyword for later commands. By typing an already known keyword in response to `C-u M-.', one merely changes the _preferred_ keyword and does nothing more. All keywords known for `M-.' are recognized by the `,' command when scanning for strings, and strings already marked by any of those known keywords are automatically skipped. If many PO files are opened simultaneously, each one has its own independent set of known keywords. There is no provision in PO mode, currently, for deleting a known keyword, you have to quit the file (maybe using `q') and reopen it afresh. When a PO file is newly brought up in an Emacs window, only `gettext' and `_' are known as keywords, and `gettext' is preferred for the `M-.' command. In fact, this is not useful to prefer `_', as this one is already built in the `M-,' command. Special Comments preceding Keywords =================================== In C programs strings are often used within calls of functions from the `printf' family. The special thing about these format strings is that they can contain format specifiers introduced with `%'. Assume we have the code printf (gettext ("String `%s' has %d characters\n"), s, strlen (s)); A possible German translation for the above string might be: "%d Zeichen lang ist die Zeichenkette `%s'" A C programmer, even if he cannot speak German, will recognize that there is something wrong here. The order of the two format specifiers is changed but of course the arguments in the `printf' don't have. This will most probably lead to problems because now the length of the string is regarded as the address. To prevent errors at runtime caused by translations the `msgfmt' tool can check statically whether the arguments in the original and the translation string match in type and number. If this is not the case and the `-c' option has been passed to `msgfmt', `msgfmt' will give an error and refuse to produce a MO file. Thus consequent use of `msgfmt -c' will catch the error, so that it cannot cause cause problems at runtime. If the word order in the above German translation would be correct one would have to write "%2$d Zeichen lang ist die Zeichenkette `%1$s'" The routines in `msgfmt' know about this special notation. Because not all strings in a program must be format strings it is not useful for `msgfmt' to test all the strings in the `.po' file. This might cause problems because the string might contain what looks like a format specifier, but the string is not used in `printf'. Therefore the `xgettext' adds a special tag to those messages it thinks might be a format string. There is no absolute rule for this, only a heuristic. In the `.po' file the entry is marked using the `c-format' flag in the `#,' comment line (*note PO Files::). The careful reader now might say that this again can cause problems. The heuristic might guess it wrong. This is true and therefore `xgettext' knows about special kind of comment which lets the programmer take over the decision. If in the same line or the immediately preceding line of the `gettext' keyword the `xgettext' program find a comment containing the words `xgettext:c-format' it will mark the string in any case with the `c-format' flag. This kind of comment should be used when `xgettext' does not recognize the string as a format string but is really is one and it should be tested. Please note that when the comment is in the same line of the `gettext' keyword, it must be before the string to be translated. This situation happens quite often. The `printf' function is often called with strings which do not contain a format specifier. Of course one would normally use `fputs' but it does happen. In this case `xgettext' does not recognize this as a format string but what happens if the translation introduces a valid format specifier? The `printf' function will try to access one of the parameter but none exists because the original code does not refer to any parameter. `xgettext' of course could make a wrong decision the other way round, i.e. a string marked as a format string actually is not a format string. In this case the `msgfmt' might give too many warnings and would prevent translating the `.po' file. The method to prevent this wrong decision is similar to the one used above, only the comment to use must contain the string `xgettext:no-c-format'. If a string is marked with `c-format' and this is not correct the user can find out who is responsible for the decision. See *Note xgettext Invocation:: to see how the `--debug' option can be used for solving this problem. Special Cases of Translatable Strings ===================================== The attentive reader might now point out that it is not always possible to mark translatable string with `gettext' or something like this. Consider the following case: { static const char *messages[] = { "some very meaningful message", "and another one" }; const char *string; ... string = index > 1 ? "a default message" : messages[index]; fputs (string); ... } While it is no problem to mark the string `"a default message"' it is not possible to mark the string initializers for `messages'. What is to be done? We have to fulfill two tasks. First we have to mark the strings so that the `xgettext' program (*note xgettext Invocation::) can find them, and second we have to translate the string at runtime before printing them. The first task can be fulfilled by creating a new keyword, which names a no-op. For the second we have to mark all access points to a string from the array. So one solution can look like this: #define gettext_noop(String) String { static const char *messages[] = { gettext_noop ("some very meaningful message"), gettext_noop ("and another one") }; const char *string; ... string = index > 1 ? gettext ("a default message") : gettext (messages[index]); fputs (string); ... } Please convince yourself that the string which is written by `fputs' is translated in any case. How to get `xgettext' know the additional keyword `gettext_noop' is explained in *Note xgettext Invocation::. The above is of course not the only solution. You could also come along with the following one: #define gettext_noop(String) String { static const char *messages[] = { gettext_noop ("some very meaningful message", gettext_noop ("and another one") }; const char *string; ... string = index > 1 ? gettext_noop ("a default message") : messages[index]; fputs (gettext (string)); ... } But this has a drawback. The programmer has to take care that he uses `gettext_noop' for the string `"a default message"'. A use of `gettext' could have in rare cases unpredictable results. One advantage is that you need not make control flow analysis to make sure the output is really translated in any case. But this analysis is generally not very difficult. If it should be in any situation you can use this second method in this situation. Making the PO Template File *************************** After preparing the sources, the programmer creates a PO template file. This section explains how to use `xgettext' for this purpose. Invoking the `xgettext' Program =============================== xgettext [OPTION] [INPUTFILE] ... The `xgettext' program extracts translatable strings from given input files. Input file location ------------------- `INPUTFILE ...' Input files. `-f FILE' `--files-from=FILE' Read the names of the input files from FILE instead of getting them from the command line. `-D DIRECTORY' `--directory=DIRECTORY' Add DIRECTORY to the list of directories. Source files are searched relative to this list of directories. The resulting `.po' file will be written relative to the current directory, though. If INPUTFILE is `-', standard input is read. Output file location -------------------- `-d NAME' `--default-domain=NAME' Use `NAME.po' for output (instead of `messages.po'). `-o FILE' `--output=FILE' Write output to specified file (instead of `NAME.po' or `messages.po'). `-p DIR' `--output-dir=DIR' Output files will be placed in directory DIR. If the output FILE is `-' or `/dev/stdout', the output is written to standard output. Choice of input file language ----------------------------- `-L NAME' `--language=NAME' Specifies the language of the input files. The supported languages are `C', `C++', `ObjectiveC', `PO', `Python', `Lisp', `EmacsLisp', `librep', `Java', `awk', `YCP', `Tcl', `RST', `Glade'. `-C' `--c++' This is a shorthand for `--language=C++'. By default the language is guessed depending on the input file name extension. Operation mode -------------- `-j' `--join-existing' Join messages with existing file. `-x FILE' `--exclude-file=FILE' Entries from FILE are not extracted. FILE should be a PO or POT file. `-c [TAG]' `--add-comments[=TAG]' Place comment block with TAG (or those preceding keyword lines) in output file. Language=C/C++ specific options ------------------------------- `-a' `--extract-all' Extract all strings. `-k KEYWORDSPEC' `--keyword[=KEYWORDSPEC]' Additional keyword to be looked for (without KEYWORDSPEC means not to use default keywords). If KEYWORDSPEC is a C identifer ID, `xgettext' looks for strings in the first argument of each call to the function or macro ID. If KEYWORDSPEC is of the form `ID:ARGNUM', `xgettext' looks for strings in the ARGNUMth argument of the call. If KEYWORDSPEC is of the form `ID:ARGNUM1,ARGNUM2', `xgettext' looks for strings in the ARGNUM1st argument and in the ARGNUM2nd argument of the call, and treats them as singular/plural variants for a message with plural handling. The default keyword specifications, which are always looked for if not explicitly disabled, are `gettext', `dgettext:2', `dcgettext:2', `ngettext:1,2', `dngettext:2,3', `dcngettext:2,3', and `gettext_noop'. `-T' `--trigraphs' Understand ANSI C trigraphs for input. `--debug' Use the flags `c-format' and `possible-c-format' to show who was responsible for marking a message as a format string. The latter form is used if the `xgettext' program decided, the format form is used if the programmer prescribed it. By default only the `c-format' form is used. The translator should not have to care about these details. This implementation of `xgettext' is able to process a few awkward cases, like strings in preprocessor macros, ANSI concatenation of adjacent strings, and escaped end of lines for continued strings. Output details -------------- `--force-po' Always write an output file even if no message is defined. `-i' `--indent' Write the .po file using indented style. `--no-location' Do not write `#: FILENAME:LINE' lines. `-n' `--add-location' Generate `#: FILENAME:LINE' lines (default). `--strict' Write out a strict Uniforum conforming PO file. Note that this Uniforum format should be avoided because it doesn't support the GNU extensions. `-w NUMBER' `--width=NUMBER' Set the output page width. Long strings in the output files will be split across multiple lines in order to ensure that each line's width (= number of screen columns) is less or equal to the given NUMBER. `--no-wrap' Do not break long message lines. Message lines whose width exceeds the output page width will not be split into several lines. Only file reference lines which are wider than the output page width will be split. `-s' `--sort-output' Generate sorted output. Note that using this option makes it much harder for the translator to understand each message's context. `-F' `--sort-by-file' Sort output by file location. `--omit-header' Don't write header with `msgid ""' entry. This is useful for testing purposes because it eliminates a source of variance for generated `.gmo' files. With `--omit-header', two invocations of `xgettext' on the same files with the same options at different times are guaranteed to produce the same results. `--copyright-holder=STRING' Set the copyright holder in the output. STRING should be the copyright holder of the surrounding package. (Note that the msgstr strings, extracted from the package's sources, belong to the copyright holder of the package.) Translators are expected to transfer or disclaim the copyright for their translations, so that package maintainers can distribute them without legal risk. If STRING is empty, the output files are marked as being in the public domain; in this case, the translators are expected to disclaim their copyright, again so that package maintainers can distribute them without legal risk. The default value for STRING is the Free Software Foundation, Inc., simply because `xgettext' was first used in the GNU project. `--foreign-user' Omit FSF copyright in output. This option is equivalent to `--copyright-holder='''. It can be useful for packages outside the GNU project that want their translations to be in the public domain. `-m [STRING]' `--msgstr-prefix[=STRING]' Use STRING (or "" if not specified) as prefix for msgstr entries. `-M [STRING]' `--msgstr-suffix[=STRING]' Use STRING (or "" if not specified) as suffix for msgstr entries. Informative output ------------------ `-h' `--help' Display this help and exit. `-V' `--version' Output version information and exit. Creating a New PO File ********************** When starting a new translation, the translator creates a file called `LANG.po', as a copy of the `PACKAGE.pot' template file with modifications in the initial comments (at the beginning of the file) and in the header entry (the first entry, near the beginning of the file). The easiest way to do so is by use of the `msginit' program. For example: $ cd PACKAGE-VERSION $ cd po $ msginit --verbose The alternative way is to do the copy and modifications by hand. To do so, the translator copies `PACKAGE.pot' to `LANG.po'. Then she modifies the initial comments and the header entry of this file. Invoking the `msginit' Program ============================== msginit [OPTION] The `msginit' program creates a new PO file, initializing the meta information with values from the user's environment. Input file location ------------------- `-i INPUTFILE' `--input=INPUTFILE' Input POT file. If no INPUTFILE is given, the current directory is searched for the POT file. If it is `-', standard input is read. Output file location -------------------- `-o FILE' `--output-file=FILE' Write output to specified PO file. If no output file is given, it depends on the `--locale' option or the user's locale setting. If it is `-', the results are written to standard output. Output details -------------- `-l LL_CC' `--locale=LL_CC' Set target locale. LL should be a language code, and CC should be a country code. The command `locale -a' can be used to output a list of all installed locales. The default is the user's locale setting. `--no-translator' Declares that the PO file will not have a human translator and is instead automatically generated. `-w NUMBER' `--width=NUMBER' Set the output page width. Long strings in the output files will be split across multiple lines in order to ensure that each line's width (= number of screen columns) is less or equal to the given NUMBER. `--no-wrap' Do not break long message lines. Message lines whose width exceeds the output page width will not be split into several lines. Only file reference lines which are wider than the output page width will be split. Informative output ------------------ `-h' `--help' Display this help and exit. `-V' `--version' Output version information and exit. Filling in the Header Entry =========================== The initial comments "SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE", "YEAR" and "FIRST AUTHOR , YEAR" ought to be replaced by sensible information. This can be done in any text editor; if Emacs is used and it switched to PO mode automatically (because it has recognized the file's suffix), you can disable it by typing `M-x fundamental-mode'. Modifying the header entry can already be done using PO mode: in Emacs, type `M-x po-mode RET' and then `RET' again to start editing the entry. You should fill in the following fields. Project-Id-Version This is the name and version of the package. POT-Creation-Date This has already been filled in by `xgettext'. PO-Revision-Date You don't need to fill this in. It will be filled by the Emacs PO mode when you save the file. Last-Translator Fill in your name and email address (without double quotes). Language-Team Fill in the English name of the language, and the email address or homepage URL of the language team you are part of. Before starting a translation, it is a good idea to get in touch with your translation team, not only to make sure you don't do duplicated work, but also to coordinate difficult linguistic issues. In the Free Translation Project, each translation team has its own mailing list. The up-to-date list of teams can be found at the Free Translation Project's homepage, `http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/', in the "National teams" area. Content-Type Replace `CHARSET' with the character encoding used for your language, in your locale, or UTF-8. This field is needed for correct operation of the `msgmerge' and `msgfmt' programs, as well as for users whose locale's character encoding differs from yours (see *Note Charset conversion::). You get the character encoding of your locale by running the shell command `locale charmap'. If the result is `C' or `ANSI_X3.4-1968', which is equivalent to `ASCII' (= `US-ASCII'), it means that your locale is not correctly configured. In this case, ask your translation team which charset to use. `ASCII' is not usable for any language except Latin. Because the PO files must be portable to operating systems with less advanced internationalization facilities, the character encodings that can be used are limited to those supported by both GNU `libc' and GNU `libiconv'. These are: `ASCII', `ISO-8859-1', `ISO-8859-2', `ISO-8859-3', `ISO-8859-4', `ISO-8859-5', `ISO-8859-6', `ISO-8859-7', `ISO-8859-8', `ISO-8859-9', `ISO-8859-13', `ISO-8859-15', `KOI8-R', `KOI8-U', `CP850', `CP866', `CP874', `CP932', `CP949', `CP950', `CP1250', `CP1251', `CP1252', `CP1253', `CP1254', `CP1255', `CP1256', `CP1257', `GB2312', `EUC-JP', `EUC-KR', `EUC-TW', `BIG5', `BIG5-HKSCS', `GBK', `GB18030', `SHIFT_JIS', `JOHAB', `TIS-620', `VISCII', `UTF-8'. In the GNU system, the following encodings are frequently used for the corresponding languages. * `ISO-8859-1' for Afrikaans, Albanian, Basque, Catalan, Dutch, English, Estonian, Faroese, Finnish, French, Galician, German, Greenlandic, Icelandic, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Malay, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, * `ISO-8859-2' for Croatian, Czech, Hungarian, Polish, Romanian, Serbian, Slovak, Slovenian, * `ISO-8859-3' for Maltese, * `ISO-8859-5' for Macedonian, Serbian, * `ISO-8859-6' for Arabic, * `ISO-8859-7' for Greek, * `ISO-8859-8' for Hebrew, * `ISO-8859-9' for Turkish, * `ISO-8859-13' for Latvian, Lithuanian, * `ISO-8859-15' for Basque, Catalan, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Galician, German, Irish, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, * `KOI8-R' for Russian, * `KOI8-U' for Ukrainian, * `CP1251' for Bulgarian, Byelorussian, * `GB2312', `GBK', `GB18030' for simplified writing of Chinese, * `BIG5', `BIG5-HKSCS' for traditional writing of Chinese, * `EUC-JP' for Japanese, * `EUC-KR' for Korean, * `TIS-620' for Thai, * `UTF-8' for any language, including those listed above. When single quote characters or double quote characters are used in translations for your language, and your locale's encoding is one of the ISO-8859-* charsets, it is best if you create your PO files in UTF-8 encoding, instead of your locale's encoding. This is because in UTF-8 the real quote characters can be represented (single quote characters: U+2018, U+2019, double quote characters: U+201C, U+201D), whereas none of ISO-8859-* charsets has them all. Users in UTF-8 locales will see the real quote characters, whereas users in ISO-8859-* locales will see the vertical apostrophe and the vertical double quote instead (because that's what the character set conversion will transliterate them to). To enter such quote characters under X11, you can change your keyboard mapping using the `xmodmap' program. The X11 names of the quote characters are "leftsinglequotemark", "rightsinglequotemark", "leftdoublequotemark", "rightdoublequotemark", "singlelowquotemark", "doublelowquotemark". Note that only recent versions of GNU Emacs support the UTF-8 encoding: Emacs 20 with Mule-UCS, and Emacs 21. As of January 2001, XEmacs doesn't support the UTF-8 encoding. The character encoding name can be written in either upper or lower case. Usually upper case is preferred. Content-Transfer-Encoding Set this to `8bit'. Plural-Forms This field is optional. It is only needed if the PO file has plural forms. You can find them by searching for the `msgid_plural' keyword. The format of the plural forms field is described in *Note Plural forms::. Updating Existing PO Files ************************** Invoking the `msgmerge' Program =============================== msgmerge [OPTION] DEF.po REF.pot The `msgmerge' program merges two Uniforum style .po files together. The DEF.po file is an existing PO file with translations which will be taken over to the newly created file as long as they still match; comments will be preserved, but extracted comments and file positions will be discarded. The REF.pot file is the last created PO file with up-to-date source references but old translations, or a PO Template file (generally created by `xgettext'); any translations or comments in the file will be discarded, however dot comments and file positions will be preserved. Where an exact match cannot be found, fuzzy matching is used to produce better results. Input file location ------------------- `DEF.po' Translations referring to old sources. `REF.pot' References to the new sources. `-D DIRECTORY' `--directory=DIRECTORY' Add DIRECTORY to the list of directories. Source files are searched relative to this list of directories. The resulting `.po' file will be written relative to the current directory, though. `-C FILE' `--compendium=FILE' Specify an additional library of message translations. *Note Compendium::. This option may be specified more than once. Operation mode -------------- `-U' `--update' Update DEF.po. Do nothing if DEF.po is already up to date. Output file location -------------------- `-o FILE' `--output-file=FILE' Write output to specified file. The results are written to standard output if no output file is specified or if it is `-'. Output file location in update mode ----------------------------------- The result is written back to DEF.po. `--backup=CONTROL' Make a backup of DEF.po `--suffix=SUFFIX' Override the usual backup suffix. The version control method may be selected via the `--backup' option or through the `VERSION_CONTROL' environment variable. Here are the values: `none' `off' Never make backups (even if `--backup' is given). `numbered' `t' Make numbered backups. `existing' `nil' Make numbered backups if numbered backups for this file already exist, otherwise make simple backups. `simple' `never' Always make simple backups. The backup suffix is `~', unless set with `--suffix' or the `SIMPLE_BACKUP_SUFFIX' environment variable. Operation modifiers ------------------- `-m' `--multi-domain' Apply REF.pot to each of the domains in DEF.po. Output details -------------- `--force-po' Always write an output file even if it contains no message. `-i' `--indent' Write the .po file using indented style. `--no-location' Do not write `#: FILENAME:LINE' lines. `--add-location' Generate `#: FILENAME:LINE' lines (default). `--strict' Write out a strict Uniforum conforming PO file. Note that this Uniforum format should be avoided because it doesn't support the GNU extensions. `-w NUMBER' `--width=NUMBER' Set the output page width. Long strings in the output files will be split across multiple lines in order to ensure that each line's width (= number of screen columns) is less or equal to the given NUMBER. `--no-wrap' Do not break long message lines. Message lines whose width exceeds the output page width will not be split into several lines. Only file reference lines which are wider than the output page width will be split. `-s' `--sort-output' Generate sorted output. Note that using this option makes it much harder for the translator to understand each message's context. `-F' `--sort-by-file' Sort output by file location. Informative output ------------------ `-h' `--help' Display this help and exit. `-V' `--version' Output version information and exit. `-v' `--verbose' Increase verbosity level. `-q' `--quiet' `--silent' Suppress progress indicators. Translated Entries ================== Each PO file entry for which the `msgstr' field has been filled with a translation, and which is not marked as fuzzy (*note Fuzzy Entries::), is said to be a "translated" entry. Only translated entries will later be compiled by GNU `msgfmt' and become usable in programs. Other entry types will be excluded; translation will not occur for them. Some commands are more specifically related to translated entry processing. `t' Find the next translated entry (`po-next-translated-entry'). `T' Find the previous translated entry (`po-previous-translated-entry'). The commands `t' (`po-next-translated-entry') and `T' (`po-previous-translated-entry') move forwards or backwards, chasing for an translated entry. If none is found, the search is extended and wraps around in the PO file buffer. Translated entries usually result from the translator having edited in a translation for them, *Note Modifying Translations::. However, if the variable `po-auto-fuzzy-on-edit' is not `nil', the entry having received a new translation first becomes a fuzzy entry, which ought to be later unfuzzied before becoming an official, genuine translated entry. *Note Fuzzy Entries::. Fuzzy Entries ============= Each PO file entry may have a set of "attributes", which are qualities given a name and explicitely associated with the translation, using a special system comment. One of these attributes has the name `fuzzy', and entries having this attribute are said to have a fuzzy translation. They are called fuzzy entries, for short. Fuzzy entries, even if they account for translated entries for most other purposes, usually call for revision by the translator. Those may be produced by applying the program `msgmerge' to update an older translated PO files according to a new PO template file, when this tool hypothesises that some new `msgid' has been modified only slightly out of an older one, and chooses to pair what it thinks to be the old translation for the new modified entry. The slight alteration in the original string (the `msgid' string) should often be reflected in the translated string, and this requires the intervention of the translator. For this reason, `msgmerge' might mark some entries as being fuzzy. Also, the translator may decide herself to mark an entry as fuzzy for her own convenience, when she wants to remember that the entry has to be later revisited. So, some commands are more specifically related to fuzzy entry processing. `z' Find the next fuzzy entry (`po-next-fuzzy-entry'). `Z' Find the previous fuzzy entry (`po-previous-fuzzy-entry'). `' Remove the fuzzy attribute of the current entry (`po-unfuzzy'). The commands `z' (`po-next-fuzzy-entry') and `Z' (`po-previous-fuzzy-entry') move forwards or backwards, chasing for a fuzzy entry. If none is found, the search is extended and wraps around in the PO file buffer. The command `' (`po-unfuzzy') removes the fuzzy attribute associated with an entry, usually leaving it translated. Further, if the variable `po-auto-select-on-unfuzzy' has not the `nil' value, the `' command will automatically chase for another interesting entry to work on. The initial value of `po-auto-select-on-unfuzzy' is `nil'. The initial value of `po-auto-fuzzy-on-edit' is `nil'. However, if the variable `po-auto-fuzzy-on-edit' is set to `t', any entry edited through the `' command is marked fuzzy, as a way to ensure some kind of double check, later. In this case, the usual paradigm is that an entry becomes fuzzy (if not already) whenever the translator modifies it. If she is satisfied with the translation, she then uses `' to pick another entry to work on, clearing the fuzzy attribute on the same blow. If she is not satisfied yet, she merely uses `' to chase another entry, leaving the entry fuzzy. The translator may also use the `' command (`po-fade-out-entry') over any translated entry to mark it as being fuzzy, when she wants to easily leave a trace she wants to later return working at this entry. Also, when time comes to quit working on a PO file buffer with the `q' command, the translator is asked for confirmation, if fuzzy string still exists. Untranslated Entries ==================== When `xgettext' originally creates a PO file, unless told otherwise, it initializes the `msgid' field with the untranslated string, and leaves the `msgstr' string to be empty. Such entries, having an empty translation, are said to be "untranslated" entries. Later, when the programmer slightly modifies some string right in the program, this change is later reflected in the PO file by the appearance of a new untranslated entry for the modified string. The usual commands moving from entry to entry consider untranslated entries on the same level as active entries. Untranslated entries are easily recognizable by the fact they end with `msgstr ""'. The work of the translator might be (quite naively) seen as the process of seeking for an untranslated entry, editing a translation for it, and repeating these actions until no untranslated entries remain. Some commands are more specifically related to untranslated entry processing. `u' Find the next untranslated entry (`po-next-untranslated-entry'). `U' Find the previous untranslated entry (`po-previous-untransted-entry'). `k' Turn the current entry into an untranslated one (`po-kill-msgstr'). The commands `u' (`po-next-untranslated-entry') and `U' (`po-previous-untransted-entry') move forwards or backwards, chasing for an untranslated entry. If none is found, the search is extended and wraps around in the PO file buffer. An entry can be turned back into an untranslated entry by merely emptying its translation, using the command `k' (`po-kill-msgstr'). *Note Modifying Translations::. Also, when time comes to quit working on a PO file buffer with the `q' command, the translator is asked for confirmation, if some untranslated string still exists. Obsolete Entries ================ By "obsolete" PO file entries, we mean those entries which are commented out, usually by `msgmerge' when it found that the translation is not needed anymore by the package being localized. The usual commands moving from entry to entry consider obsolete entries on the same level as active entries. Obsolete entries are easily recognizable by the fact that all their lines start with `#', even those lines containing `msgid' or `msgstr'. Commands exist for emptying the translation or reinitializing it to the original untranslated string. Commands interfacing with the kill ring may force some previously saved text into the translation. The user may interactively edit the translation. All these commands may apply to obsolete entries, carefully leaving the entry obsolete after the fact. Moreover, some commands are more specifically related to obsolete entry processing. `o' Find the next obsolete entry (`po-next-obsolete-entry'). `O' Find the previous obsolete entry (`po-previous-obsolete-entry'). `' Make an active entry obsolete, or zap out an obsolete entry (`po-fade-out-entry'). The commands `o' (`po-next-obsolete-entry') and `O' (`po-previous-obsolete-entry') move forwards or backwards, chasing for an obsolete entry. If none is found, the search is extended and wraps around in the PO file buffer. PO mode does not provide ways for un-commenting an obsolete entry and making it active, because this would reintroduce an original untranslated string which does not correspond to any marked string in the program sources. This goes with the philosophy of never introducing useless `msgid' values. However, it is possible to comment out an active entry, so making it obsolete. GNU `gettext' utilities will later react to the disappearance of a translation by using the untranslated string. The command `' (`po-fade-out-entry') pushes the current entry a little further towards annihilation. If the entry is active (it is a translated entry), then it is first made fuzzy. If it is already fuzzy, then the entry is merely commented out, with confirmation. If the entry is already obsolete, then it is completely deleted from the PO file. It is easy to recycle the translation so deleted into some other PO file entry, usually one which is untranslated. *Note Modifying Translations::. Here is a quite interesting problem to solve for later development of PO mode, for those nights you are not sleepy. The idea would be that PO mode might become bright enough, one of these days, to make good guesses at retrieving the most probable candidate, among all obsolete entries, for initializing the translation of a newly appeared string. I think it might be a quite hard problem to do this algorithmically, as we have to develop good and efficient measures of string similarity. Right now, PO mode completely lets the decision to the translator, when the time comes to find the adequate obsolete translation, it merely tries to provide handy tools for helping her to do so. Modifying Translations ====================== PO mode prevents direct modification of the PO file, by the usual means Emacs gives for altering a buffer's contents. By doing so, it pretends helping the translator to avoid little clerical errors about the overall file format, or the proper quoting of strings, as those errors would be easily made. Other kinds of errors are still possible, but some may be caught and diagnosed by the batch validation process, which the translator may always trigger by the `V' command. For all other errors, the translator has to rely on her own judgment, and also on the linguistic reports submitted to her by the users of the translated package, having the same mother tongue. When the time comes to create a translation, correct an error diagnosed mechanically or reported by a user, the translators have to resort to using the following commands for modifying the translations. `' Interactively edit the translation (`po-edit-msgstr'). `' `C-j' Reinitialize the translation with the original, untranslated string (`po-msgid-to-msgstr'). `k' Save the translation on the kill ring, and delete it (`po-kill-msgstr'). `w' Save the translation on the kill ring, without deleting it (`po-kill-ring-save-msgstr'). `y' Replace the translation, taking the new from the kill ring (`po-yank-msgstr'). The command `' (`po-edit-msgstr') opens a new Emacs window meant to edit in a new translation, or to modify an already existing translation. The new window contains a copy of the translation taken from the current PO file entry, all ready for edition, expunged of all quoting marks, fully modifiable and with the complete extent of Emacs modifying commands. When the translator is done with her modifications, she may use `C-c C-c' to close the subedit window with the automatically requoted results, or `C-c C-k' to abort her modifications. *Note Subedit::, for more information. The command `' (`po-msgid-to-msgstr') initializes, or reinitializes the translation with the original string. This command is normally used when the translator wants to redo a fresh translation of the original string, disregarding any previous work. It is possible to arrange so, whenever editing an untranslated entry, the `' command be automatically executed. If you set `po-auto-edit-with-msgid' to `t', the translation gets initialised with the original string, in case none exists already. The default value for `po-auto-edit-with-msgid' is `nil'. In fact, whether it is best to start a translation with an empty string, or rather with a copy of the original string, is a matter of taste or habit. Sometimes, the source language and the target language are so different that is simply best to start writing on an empty page. At other times, the source and target languages are so close that it would be a waste to retype a number of words already being written in the original string. A translator may also like having the original string right under her eyes, as she will progressively overwrite the original text with the translation, even if this requires some extra editing work to get rid of the original. The command `k' (`po-kill-msgstr') merely empties the translation string, so turning the entry into an untranslated one. But while doing so, its previous contents is put apart in a special place, known as the kill ring. The command `w' (`po-kill-ring-save-msgstr') has also the effect of taking a copy of the translation onto the kill ring, but it otherwise leaves the entry alone, and does _not_ remove the translation from the entry. Both commands use exactly the Emacs kill ring, which is shared between buffers, and which is well known already to Emacs lovers. The translator may use `k' or `w' many times in the course of her work, as the kill ring may hold several saved translations. From the kill ring, strings may later be reinserted in various Emacs buffers. In particular, the kill ring may be used for moving translation strings between different entries of a single PO file buffer, or if the translator is handling many such buffers at once, even between PO files. To facilitate exchanges with buffers which are not in PO mode, the translation string put on the kill ring by the `k' command is fully unquoted before being saved: external quotes are removed, multi-line strings are concatenated, and backslash escaped sequences are turned into their corresponding characters. In the special case of obsolete entries, the translation is also uncommented prior to saving. The command `y' (`po-yank-msgstr') completely replaces the translation of the current entry by a string taken from the kill ring. Following Emacs terminology, we then say that the replacement string is "yanked" into the PO file buffer. *Note Yanking: (emacs)Yanking. The first time `y' is used, the translation receives the value of the most recent addition to the kill ring. If `y' is typed once again, immediately, without intervening keystrokes, the translation just inserted is taken away and replaced by the second most recent addition to the kill ring. By repeating `y' many times in a row, the translator may travel along the kill ring for saved strings, until she finds the string she really wanted. When a string is yanked into a PO file entry, it is fully and automatically requoted for complying with the format PO files should have. Further, if the entry is obsolete, PO mode then appropriately push the inserted string inside comments. Once again, translators should not burden themselves with quoting considerations besides, of course, the necessity of the translated string itself respective to the program using it. Note that `k' or `w' are not the only commands pushing strings on the kill ring, as almost any PO mode command replacing translation strings (or the translator comments) automatically saves the old string on the kill ring. The main exceptions to this general rule are the yanking commands themselves. To better illustrate the operation of killing and yanking, let's use an actual example, taken from a common situation. When the programmer slightly modifies some string right in the program, his change is later reflected in the PO file by the appearance of a new untranslated entry for the modified string, and the fact that the entry translating the original or unmodified string becomes obsolete. In many cases, the translator might spare herself some work by retrieving the unmodified translation from the obsolete entry, then initializing the untranslated entry `msgstr' field with this retrieved translation. Once this done, the obsolete entry is not wanted anymore, and may be safely deleted. When the translator finds an untranslated entry and suspects that a slight variant of the translation exists, she immediately uses `m' to mark the current entry location, then starts chasing obsolete entries with `o', hoping to find some translation corresponding to the unmodified string. Once found, she uses the `' command for deleting the obsolete entry, knowing that `' also _kills_ the translation, that is, pushes the translation on the kill ring. Then, `r' returns to the initial untranslated entry, and `y' then _yanks_ the saved translation right into the `msgstr' field. The translator is then free to use `' for fine tuning the translation contents, and maybe to later use `u', then `m' again, for going on with the next untranslated string. When some sequence of keys has to be typed over and over again, the translator may find it useful to become better acquainted with the Emacs capability of learning these sequences and playing them back under request. *Note Keyboard Macros: (emacs)Keyboard Macros. Modifying Comments ================== Any translation work done seriously will raise many linguistic difficulties, for which decisions have to be made, and the choices further documented. These documents may be saved within the PO file in form of translator comments, which the translator is free to create, delete, or modify at will. These comments may be useful to herself when she returns to this PO file after a while. Comments not having whitespace after the initial `#', for example, those beginning with `#.' or `#:', are _not_ translator comments, they are exclusively created by other `gettext' tools. So, the commands below will never alter such system added comments, they are not meant for the translator to modify. *Note PO Files::. The following commands are somewhat similar to those modifying translations, so the general indications given for those apply here. *Note Modifying Translations::. `#' Interactively edit the translator comments (`po-edit-comment'). `K' Save the translator comments on the kill ring, and delete it (`po-kill-comment'). `W' Save the translator comments on the kill ring, without deleting it (`po-kill-ring-save-comment'). `Y' Replace the translator comments, taking the new from the kill ring (`po-yank-comment'). These commands parallel PO mode commands for modifying the translation strings, and behave much the same way as they do, except that they handle this part of PO file comments meant for translator usage, rather than the translation strings. So, if the descriptions given below are slightly succinct, it is because the full details have already been given. *Note Modifying Translations::. The command `#' (`po-edit-comment') opens a new Emacs window containing a copy of the translator comments on the current PO file entry. If there are no such comments, PO mode understands that the translator wants to add a comment to the entry, and she is presented with an empty screen. Comment marks (`#') and the space following them are automatically removed before edition, and reinstated after. For translator comments pertaining to obsolete entries, the uncommenting and recommenting operations are done twice. Once in the editing window, the keys `C-c C-c' allow the translator to tell she is finished with editing the comment. *Note Subedit::, for further details. Functions found on `po-subedit-mode-hook', if any, are executed after the string has been inserted in the edit buffer. The command `K' (`po-kill-comment') gets rid of all translator comments, while saving those comments on the kill ring. The command `W' (`po-kill-ring-save-comment') takes a copy of the translator comments on the kill ring, but leaves them undisturbed in the current entry. The command `Y' (`po-yank-comment') completely replaces the translator comments by a string taken at the front of the kill ring. When this command is immediately repeated, the comments just inserted are withdrawn, and replaced by other strings taken along the kill ring. On the kill ring, all strings have the same nature. There is no distinction between _translation_ strings and _translator comments_ strings. So, for example, let's presume the translator has just finished editing a translation, and wants to create a new translator comment to document why the previous translation was not good, just to remember what was the problem. Foreseeing that she will do that in her documentation, the translator may want to quote the previous translation in her translator comments. To do so, she may initialize the translator comments with the previous translation, still at the head of the kill ring. Because editing already pushed the previous translation on the kill ring, she merely has to type `M-w' prior to `#', and the previous translation will be right there, all ready for being introduced by some explanatory text. On the other hand, presume there are some translator comments already and that the translator wants to add to those comments, instead of wholly replacing them. Then, she should edit the comment right away with `#'. Once inside the editing window, she can use the regular Emacs commands `C-y' (`yank') and `M-y' (`yank-pop') to get the previous translation where she likes. Details of Sub Edition ====================== The PO subedit minor mode has a few peculiarities worth being described in fuller detail. It installs a few commands over the usual editing set of Emacs, which are described below. `C-c C-c' Complete edition (`po-subedit-exit'). `C-c C-k' Abort edition (`po-subedit-abort'). `C-c C-a' Consult auxiliary PO files (`po-subedit-cycle-auxiliary'). The window's contents represents a translation for a given message, or a translator comment. The translator may modify this window to her heart's content. Once this is done, the command `C-c C-c' (`po-subedit-exit') may be used to return the edited translation into the PO file, replacing the original translation, even if it moved out of sight or if buffers were switched. If the translator becomes unsatisfied with her translation or comment, to the extent she prefers keeping what was existent prior to the `' or `#' command, she may use the command `C-c C-k' (`po-subedit-abort') to merely get rid of edition, while preserving the original translation or comment. Another way would be for her to exit normally with `C-c C-c', then type `U' once for undoing the whole effect of last edition. The command `C-c C-a' (`po-subedit-cycle-auxiliary') allows for glancing through translations already achieved in other languages, directly while editing the current translation. This may be quite convenient when the translator is fluent at many languages, but of course, only makes sense when such completed auxiliary PO files are already available to her (*note Auxiliary::). Functions found on `po-subedit-mode-hook', if any, are executed after the string has been inserted in the edit buffer. While editing her translation, the translator should pay attention to not inserting unwanted `' (newline) characters at the end of the translated string if those are not meant to be there, or to removing such characters when they are required. Since these characters are not visible in the editing buffer, they are easily introduced by mistake. To help her, `' automatically puts the character `<' at the end of the string being edited, but this `<' is not really part of the string. On exiting the editing window with `C-c C-c', PO mode automatically removes such `<' and all whitespace added after it. If the translator adds characters after the terminating `<', it looses its delimiting property and integrally becomes part of the string. If she removes the delimiting `<', then the edited string is taken _as is_, with all trailing newlines, even if invisible. Also, if the translated string ought to end itself with a genuine `<', then the delimiting `<' may not be removed; so the string should appear, in the editing window, as ending with two `<' in a row. When a translation (or a comment) is being edited, the translator may move the cursor back into the PO file buffer and freely move to other entries, browsing at will. If, with an edition pending, the translator wanders in the PO file buffer, she may decide to start modifying another entry. Each entry being edited has its own subedit buffer. It is possible to simultaneously edit the translation _and_ the comment of a single entry, or to edit entries in different PO files, all at once. Typing `' on a field already being edited merely resumes that particular edit. Yet, the translator should better be comfortable at handling many Emacs windows! Pending subedits may be completed or aborted in any order, regardless of how or when they were started. When many subedits are pending and the translator asks for quitting the PO file (with the `q' command), subedits are automatically resumed one at a time, so she may decide for each of them. C Sources Context ================= PO mode is particularily powerful when used with PO files created through GNU `gettext' utilities, as those utilities insert special comments in the PO files they generate. Some of these special comments relate the PO file entry to exactly where the untranslated string appears in the program sources. When the translator gets to an untranslated entry, she is fairly often faced with an original string which is not as informative as it normally should be, being succinct, cryptic, or otherwise ambiguous. Before chosing how to translate the string, she needs to understand better what the string really means and how tight the translation has to be. Most of times, when problems arise, the only way left to make her judgment is looking at the true program sources from where this string originated, searching for surrounding comments the programmer might have put in there, and looking around for helping clues of _any_ kind. Surely, when looking at program sources, the translator will receive more help if she is a fluent programmer. However, even if she is not versed in programming and feels a little lost in C code, the translator should not be shy at taking a look, once in a while. It is most probable that she will still be able to find some of the hints she needs. She will learn quickly to not feel uncomfortable in program code, paying more attention to programmer's comments, variable and function names (if he dared chosing them well), and overall organization, than to programmation itself. The following commands are meant to help the translator at getting program source context for a PO file entry. `s' Resume the display of a program source context, or cycle through them (`po-cycle-source-reference'). `M-s' Display of a program source context selected by menu (`po-select-source-reference'). `S' Add a directory to the search path for source files (`po-consider-source-path'). `M-S' Delete a directory from the search path for source files (`po-ignore-source-path'). The commands `s' (`po-cycle-source-reference') and `M-s' (`po-select-source-reference') both open another window displaying some source program file, and already positioned in such a way that it shows an actual use of the string to be translated. By doing so, the command gives source program context for the string. But if the entry has no source context references, or if all references are unresolved along the search path for program sources, then the command diagnoses this as an error. Even if `s' (or `M-s') opens a new window, the cursor stays in the PO file window. If the translator really wants to get into the program source window, she ought to do it explicitly, maybe by using command `O'. When `s' is typed for the first time, or for a PO file entry which is different of the last one used for getting source context, then the command reacts by giving the first context available for this entry, if any. If some context has already been recently displayed for the current PO file entry, and the translator wandered off to do other things, typing `s' again will merely resume, in another window, the context last displayed. In particular, if the translator moved the cursor away from the context in the source file, the command will bring the cursor back to the context. By using `s' many times in a row, with no other commands intervening, PO mode will cycle to the next available contexts for this particular entry, getting back to the first context once the last has been shown. The command `M-s' behaves differently. Instead of cycling through references, it lets the translator choose a particular reference among many, and displays that reference. It is best used with completion, if the translator types `' immediately after `M-s', in response to the question, she will be offered a menu of all possible references, as a reminder of which are the acceptable answers. This command is useful only where there are really many contexts available for a single string to translate. Program source files are usually found relative to where the PO file stands. As a special provision, when this fails, the file is also looked for, but relative to the directory immediately above it. Those two cases take proper care of most PO files. However, it might happen that a PO file has been moved, or is edited in a different place than its normal location. When this happens, the translator should tell PO mode in which directory normally sits the genuine PO file. Many such directories may be specified, and all together, they constitute what is called the "search path" for program sources. The command `S' (`po-consider-source-path') is used to interactively enter a new directory at the front of the search path, and the command `M-S' (`po-ignore-source-path') is used to select, with completion, one of the directories she does not want anymore on the search path. Consulting Auxiliary PO Files ============================= PO mode is able to help the knowledgeable translator, being fluent in many languages, at taking advantage of translations already achieved in other languages she just happens to know. It provides these other language translations as additional context for her own work. Moreover, it has features to ease the production of translations for many languages at once, for translators preferring to work in this way. An "auxiliary" PO file is an existing PO file meant for the same package the translator is working on, but targeted to a different mother tongue language. Commands exist for declaring and handling auxiliary PO files, and also for showing contexts for the entry under work. Here are the auxiliary file commands available in PO mode. `a' Seek auxiliary files for another translation for the same entry (`po-cycle-auxiliary'). `C-c C-a' Switch to a particular auxiliary file (`po-select-auxiliary'). `A' Declare this PO file as an auxiliary file (`po-consider-as-auxiliary'). `M-A' Remove this PO file from the list of auxiliary files (`po-ignore-as-auxiliary'). Command `A' (`po-consider-as-auxiliary') adds the current PO file to the list of auxiliary files, while command `M-A' (`po-ignore-as-auxiliary' just removes it. The command `a' (`po-cycle-auxiliary') seeks all auxiliary PO files, round-robin, searching for a translated entry in some other language having an `msgid' field identical as the one for the current entry. The found PO file, if any, takes the place of the current PO file in the display (its window gets on top). Before doing so, the current PO file is also made into an auxiliary file, if not already. So, `a' in this newly displayed PO file will seek another PO file, and so on, so repeating `a' will eventually yield back